In the exciting subject of computer vision, where images contain many secrets and information, distinguishing and highlighting items is crucial. Image segmentation, the process of splitting images into meaningful regions or objects, is essential in various applications ranging from medical imaging to autonomous driving and object recognition. Accurate and automatic segmentation has long been challenging, with traditional approaches frequently falling short in accuracy and efficiency. Enter the UNET architecture, an intelligent method that has revolutionized image segmentation. With its simple design and inventive techniques, UNET has paved the way for more accurate and robust segmentation findings. Whether you are a newcomer to the exciting field of computer vision or an experienced practitioner looking to improve your segmentation abilities, this in-depth blog article will unravel the complexities of UNET and provide a complete understanding of its architecture, components, and usefulness.
This article will tell about the U-Net structure, a popular neural network used for image segmentation. U-Net is specially created with a structure that consists of both an encoder and a decoder, as well as skip connections, which allows it to make precise predictions for every pixel within an image. Describing the U-Net structure helps us grasp its efficiency in different fields.
This article was published as a part of the Data Science Blogathon.
CNNs are a deep learning model frequently employed in computer vision tasks, including image classification, object recognition, and picture segmentation. CNNs are mainly to learn and extract relevant information from images, making them extremely useful in visual data analysis.
The network begins with a stack of convolutional layers to capture low-level features, followed by pooling layers. Deeper convolutional layers learn higher-level characteristics as the network evolves. Finally, use one or more full layers for the classification or regression operation.
Traditional CNNs are generally intended for image classification jobs in which a single label is assigned to the whole input image. On the other hand, traditional CNN architectures have problems with finer-grained tasks like semantic segmentation, in which each pixel of an image must be sorted into various classes or regions. Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) come into play here.
Loss of Spatial Information: Traditional CNNs use pooling layers to gradually reduce the spatial dimensionality of feature maps. While this downsampling helps capture high-level features, it results in a loss of spatial information, making it difficult to precisely detect and split objects at the pixel level.
Fixed Input Size: CNN architectures are often built to accept images of a specific size. However, the input images might have various dimensions in segmentation tasks, making variable-sized inputs challenging to manage with typical CNNs.
Limited Localisation Accuracy: Traditional CNNs often use fully connected layers at the end to provide a fixed-size output vector for classification. Because they do not retain spatial information, they cannot precisely localize objects or regions within the image.
By working exclusively on convolutional layers and maintaining spatial information throughout the network, Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) address the constraints of classic CNN architectures in segmentation tasks. FCNs are intended to make pixel-by-pixel predictions, with each pixel in the input image assigned a label or class. FCNs enable the construction of a dense segmentation map with pixel-level forecasts by upsampling the feature maps. Transposed convolutions (also known as deconvolutions or upsampling layers) are used to replace the completely linked layers after the CNN design. The spatial resolution of the feature maps is increased by transposed convolutions, allowing them to be the same size as the input image.
During upsampling, FCNs generally use skip connections, bypassing specific layers and directly linking lower-level feature maps with higher-level ones. These skip relationships aid in preserving fine-grained details and contextual information, boosting the segmented regions’ localization accuracy. FCNs are extremely effective in various segmentation applications, including medical picture segmentation, scene parsing, and instance segmentation. It can now handle input images of various sizes, provide pixel-level predictions, and keep spatial information across the network by leveraging FCNs for semantic segmentation.
Image segmentation is a fundamental process in computer vision in which an image is divided into many meaningful and separate parts or segments. In contrast to image classification, which provides a single label to a complete image, segmentation adds labels to each pixel or group of pixels, essentially splitting the image into semantically significant parts. Image segmentation is important because it allows for a more detailed comprehension of the contents of an image. We can extract considerable information about object boundaries, forms, sizes, and spatial relationships by segmenting a picture into multiple parts. This fine-grained analysis is critical in various computer vision tasks, enabling improved applications and supporting higher-level visual data interpretations.
Traditional image segmentation technologies, such as manual annotation and pixel-wise classification, have various disadvantages that make them wasteful and difficult for accurate and effective segmentation jobs. Because of these constraints, more advanced solutions, such as the UNET architecture, have been developed. Let us look at the flaws of previous ways and why UNET was created to overcome these issues.
The UNET architecture was developed to address these limitations and overcome the challenges faced by traditional approaches to image segmentation. Here’s how UNET tackles these issues:
UNET is a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) architecture built for image segmentation applications. It was first proposed in 2015 by Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. UNET is frequently utilized for its accuracy in picture segmentation and has become a popular choice in various medical imaging applications. UNET combines an encoding path, also called the contracting path, with a decoding path called the expanding path. The architecture is named after its U-shaped look when depicted in a diagram. Because of this U-shaped architecture, the network can record both local features and global context, resulting in exact segmentation results.
ReadMore about the Neural Network in Machine Learning
The encoding path, or the contracting path, is an essential component of UNET architecture. It is responsible for extracting high-level information from the input image while gradually shrinking the spatial dimensions.
The encoding process begins with a set of convolutional layers. Convolutional layers extract information at multiple scales by applying a set of learnable filters to the input image. These filters operate on the local receptive field, allowing the network to catch spatial patterns and minor features. With each convolutional layer, the depth of the feature maps grows, allowing the network to learn more complicated representations.
Following each convolutional layer, an activation function such as the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) is applied element by element to induce non-linearity into the network. The activation function aids the network in learning non-linear correlations between input images and retrieved features.
Pooling layers are used after the convolutional layers to reduce the spatial dimensionality of the feature maps. The operations, such as max pooling, divide feature maps into non-overlapping regions and keep only the maximum value inside each zone. It reduces the spatial resolution by down-sampling feature maps, allowing the network to capture more abstract and higher-level data.
The encoding path’s job is to capture features at various scales and levels of abstraction in a hierarchical manner. The encoding process focuses on extracting global context and high-level information as the spatial dimensions decrease.
The availability of skip connections that connect appropriate levels from the encoding path to the decoding path is one of the UNET architecture’s distinguishing features. These skip links are critical in maintaining key data during the encoding process.
Feature maps from prior layers collect local details and fine-grained information during the encoding path. These feature maps are concatenated with the upsampled feature maps in the decoding pipeline utilizing skip connections. This allows the network to incorporate multi-scale data, low-level features and high-level context into the segmentation process.
By conserving spatial information from prior layers, UNET can reliably localize objects and keep finer details in segmentation results. UNET’s skip connections aid in addressing the issue of information loss caused by downsampling. The skip links allow for more excellent local and global information integration, improving segmentation performance overall.
To summarise, the UNET encoding approach is critical for capturing high-level characteristics and lowering the spatial dimensions of the input image. The encoding path extracts progressively abstract representations via convolutional layers, activation functions, and pooling layers. By integrating local features and global context, introducing skip links allows for preserving critical spatial information, facilitating reliable segmentation outcomes.
A critical component of the UNET architecture is the decoding path, also known as the expanding path. It is responsible for upsampling the encoding path’s feature maps and constructing the final segmentation mask.
To boost the spatial resolution of the feature maps, the UNET decoding method includes upsampling layers, frequently done using transposed convolutions or deconvolutions. Transposed convolutions are essentially the opposite of regular convolutions. They enhance spatial dimensions rather than decrease them, allowing for upsampling. By constructing a sparse kernel and applying it to the input feature map, transposed convolutions learn to upsample the feature maps. The network learns to fill in the gaps between the current spatial locations during this process, thus boosting the resolution of the feature maps.
If you want Now Starting From Image Segmenation Checkout this article!
The UNET decoding process reconstructs a dense segmentation map that aligns with the input image’s spatial resolution. By progressively upsampling feature maps and incorporating skip connections from the encoding path, the network effectively combines high-level context with low-level features. This enables precise object localization and delineation in the segmentation mask while recovering fine-grained details lost during encoding.
The decoding path also employs transposed convolutions to enhance the spatial resolution of feature maps, upsampling them to match the original image size. These transposed convolutions allow the network to generate a dense, fine-grained segmentation mask by learning to fill gaps and refine spatial dimensions. This integration of multi-scale information and spatial refinement ensures accurate and comprehensive segmentation results.
Clear you Understanding with Machine Learning Algorithms
In summary, the decoding process in UNET reconstructs the segmentation mask by enhancing the spatial resolution of the feature maps via upsampling layers and skip connections. Transposed convolutions are critical in this phase because they allow the network to upsample the feature maps and build a detailed segmentation mask that matches the original input image.
The UNET architecture follows an “encoder-decoder” structure, where the contracting path represents the encoder, and the expanding path represents the decoder. This design resembles encoding information into a compressed form and then decoding it to reconstruct the original data.
The encoder in UNET is the contracting path. It extracts context and compresses the input image by gradually decreasing the spatial dimensions. This method includes convolutional layers followed by pooling procedures such as max pooling to downsample the feature maps. The contracting path is responsible for obtaining high-level characteristics, learning global context, and decreasing spatial resolution. It focuses on compressing and abstracting the input image, efficiently capturing relevant information for segmentation.
The decoder in UNET is the expanding path. By upsampling the feature maps from the contracting path, it recovers spatial information and generates the final segmentation map. The expanding route comprises upsampling layers, often performed with transposed convolutions or deconvolutions to increase the spatial resolution of the feature maps. The expanding path reconstructs the original spatial dimensions via skip connections by integrating the upsampled feature maps with the equivalent maps from the contracting path. This method enables the network to recover fine-grained features and properly localize items.
The UNET design captures global context and local details by mixing contracting and expanding pathways. The contracting path compresses the input image into a compact representation, decided to build a detailed segmentation map by the expanding path. The expanding path concerns decoding the compressed representation into a dense and precise segmentation map. It reconstructs the missing spatial information and refines the segmentation results. This encoder-decoder structure enables precision segmentation using high-level context and fine-grained spatial information.
In summary, UNET’s contracting and expanding routes resemble an “encoder-decoder” structure. The expanding path is the decoder, recovering spatial information and generating the final segmentation map. In contrast, the contracting path serves as the encoder, capturing context and compressing the input image. This architecture enables UNET to encode and decode information effectively, allowing for accurate and thorough image segmentation.
Skip connections are essential to the UNET design because they allow information to travel between the contracting (encoding) and expanding (decoding) paths. They are critical for maintaining spatial information and improving segmentation accuracy.
Some spatial information may be lost during the encoding path as the feature maps undergo downsampling procedures such as max pooling. This information loss can lead to lower localization accuracy and a loss of fine-grained details in the segmentation mask.
By establishing direct connections between corresponding layers in the encoding and decoding processes, skip connections help to address this issue. Skip connections protect vital spatial information that would otherwise be lost during downsampling. These connections allow information from the encoding stream to avoid downsampling and be transmitted directly to the decoding path.
Skip connections allow the merging of multi-scale information from many network layers. Later levels of the encoding process capture high-level context and semantic information, whereas earlier layers catch local details and fine-grained information. UNET may successfully combine local and global information by connecting these feature maps from the encoding path to the equivalent layers in the decoding path. This integration of multi-scale information improves segmentation accuracy overall. The network can use low-level data from the encoding path to refine segmentation findings in the decoding path, allowing for more precise localization and better object boundary delineation.
Skip connections allow the decoding path to combine high-level context and low-level details. The concatenated feature maps from the skip connections include the decoding path’s upsampled feature maps and the encoding path’s feature maps.
This combination enables the network to take advantage of the high-level context recorded in the decoding path and the fine-grained features captured in the encoding path. The network may incorporate information of several sizes, allowing for more precise and detailed segmentation.
UNET may take advantage of multi-scale information, preserve spatial details, and merge high-level context with low-level details by adding skip connections. As a result, segmentation accuracy improves, object localization improves, and fine-grained information in the segmentation mask is retained.
In conclusion, skip connections in UNETs are critical for maintaining spatial information, integrating multi-scale information, and boosting segmentation accuracy. They provide direct information flow across the encoding and decoding routes, allowing the network to collect local and global details, resulting in more precise and detailed image segmentation.
It is critical to select an appropriate loss function while training UNET and optimizing its parameters for picture segmentation tasks. UNET frequently employs segmentation-friendly loss functions such as the Dice coefficient or cross-entropy loss.
The Dice coefficient is a similarity statistic that calculates the overlap between the anticipated and true segmentation masks. The Dice coefficient loss, or soft Dice loss, is calculated by subtracting one from the Dice coefficient. When the anticipated and ground truth masks align well, the loss minimizes, resulting in a higher Dice coefficient.
The Dice coefficient loss is especially effective for unbalanced datasets in which the background class has many pixels. By penalizing false positives and false negatives, it promotes the network to divide both foreground and background regions accurately.
Use cross-entropy loss function in image segmentation tasks. It measures the dissimilarity between the predicted class probabilities and the ground truth labels. Treat each pixel as an independent classification problem in image segmentation, and the cross-entropy loss is computed pixel-wise.
The cross-entropy loss encourages the network to assign high probabilities to the correct class labels for each pixel. It penalizes deviations from the ground truth, promoting accurate segmentation results. This loss function is effective when the foreground and background classes are balanced or when multiple classes are involved in the segmentation task.
The choice between the Dice coefficient loss and cross-entropy loss depends on the segmentation task’s specific requirements and the dataset’s characteristics. Both loss functions have advantages and can be combined or customized based on specific needs.
import tensorflow as tf
import os
import numpy as np
from tqdm import tqdm
from skimage.io import imread, imshow
from skimage.transform import resize
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import random
IMG_WIDTH = 128
IMG_HEIGHT = 128
IMG_CHANNELS = 3
seed = 42
np.random.seed = seed
# Data downloaded from - https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/data-science-bowl-2018/data
#importing datasets
TRAIN_PATH = 'stage1_train/'
TEST_PATH = 'stage1_test/'
train_ids = next(os.walk(TRAIN_PATH))[1]
test_ids = next(os.walk(TEST_PATH))[1]
X_train = np.zeros((len(train_ids), IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS), dtype=np.uint8)
Y_train = np.zeros((len(train_ids), IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, 1), dtype=np.bool)
print('Resizing training images and masks')
for n, id_ in tqdm(enumerate(train_ids), total=len(train_ids)):
path = TRAIN_PATH + id_
img = imread(path + '/images/' + id_ + '.png')[:,:,:IMG_CHANNELS]
img = resize(img, (IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH), mode='constant', preserve_range=True)
X_train[n] = img #Fill empty X_train with values from img
mask = np.zeros((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, 1), dtype=np.bool)
for mask_file in next(os.walk(path + '/masks/'))[2]:
mask_ = imread(path + '/masks/' + mask_file)
mask_ = np.expand_dims(resize(mask_, (IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH), mode='constant',
preserve_range=True), axis=-1)
mask = np.maximum(mask, mask_)
Y_train[n] = mask
# test images
X_test = np.zeros((len(test_ids), IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS), dtype=np.uint8)
sizes_test = []
print('Resizing test images')
for n, id_ in tqdm(enumerate(test_ids), total=len(test_ids)):
path = TEST_PATH + id_
img = imread(path + '/images/' + id_ + '.png')[:,:,:IMG_CHANNELS]
sizes_test.append([img.shape[0], img.shape[1]])
img = resize(img, (IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH), mode='constant', preserve_range=True)
X_test[n] = img
print('Done!')
image_x = random.randint(0, len(train_ids))
imshow(X_train[image_x])
plt.show()
imshow(np.squeeze(Y_train[image_x]))
plt.show()
inputs = tf.keras.layers.Input((IMG_HEIGHT, IMG_WIDTH, IMG_CHANNELS))
s = tf.keras.layers.Lambda(lambda x: x / 255)(inputs)
#Contraction path
c1 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(s)
c1 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.1)(c1)
c1 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(c1)
p1 = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2))(c1)
c2 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(p1)
c2 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.1)(c2)
c2 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(c2)
p2 = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2))(c2)
c3 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(p2)
c3 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(c3)
c3 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(c3)
p3 = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2))(c3)
c4 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(p3)
c4 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(c4)
c4 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(c4)
p4 = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(c4)
c5 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(256, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(p4)
c5 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.3)(c5)
c5 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(256, (3, 3), activation='relu',
kernel_initializer='he_normal', padding='same')(c5)
u6 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2DTranspose(128, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same')(c5)
u6 = tf.keras.layers.concatenate([u6, c4])
c6 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(u6)
c6 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(c6)
c6 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(c6)
u7 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2DTranspose(64, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same')(c6)
u7 = tf.keras.layers.concatenate([u7, c3])
c7 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(u7)
c7 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.2)(c7)
c7 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(c7)
u8 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2DTranspose(32, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same')(c7)
u8 = tf.keras.layers.concatenate([u8, c2])
c8 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(u8)
c8 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.1)(c8)
c8 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(c8)
u9 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2DTranspose(16, (2, 2), strides=(2, 2), padding='same')(c8)
u9 = tf.keras.layers.concatenate([u9, c1], axis=3)
c9 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(u9)
c9 = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.1)(c9)
c9 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(16, (3, 3), activation='relu', kernel_initializer='he_normal',
padding='same')(c9)
outputs = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(1, (1, 1), activation='sigmoid')(c9)
model = tf.keras.Model(inputs=[inputs], outputs=[outputs])
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='binary_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()
checkpointer = tf.keras.callbacks.ModelCheckpoint('model_for_nuclei.h5',
verbose=1, save_best_only=True)
callbacks = [
tf.keras.callbacks.EarlyStopping(patience=2, monitor='val_loss'),
tf.keras.callbacks.TensorBoard(log_dir='logs')]
results = model.fit(X_train, Y_train, validation_split=0.1, batch_size=16, epochs=25,
callbacks=callbacks)
idx = random.randint(0, len(X_train))
preds_train = model.predict(X_train[:int(X_train.shape[0]*0.9)], verbose=1)
preds_val = model.predict(X_train[int(X_train.shape[0]*0.9):], verbose=1)
preds_test = model.predict(X_test, verbose=1)
preds_train_t = (preds_train > 0.5).astype(np.uint8)
preds_val_t = (preds_val > 0.5).astype(np.uint8)
preds_test_t = (preds_test > 0.5).astype(np.uint8)
# Perform a sanity check on some random training samples
ix = random.randint(0, len(preds_train_t))
imshow(X_train[ix])
plt.show()
imshow(np.squeeze(Y_train[ix]))
plt.show()
imshow(np.squeeze(preds_train_t[ix]))
plt.show()
# Perform a sanity check on some random validation samples
ix = random.randint(0, len(preds_val_t))
imshow(X_train[int(X_train.shape[0]*0.9):][ix])
plt.show()
imshow(np.squeeze(Y_train[int(Y_train.shape[0]*0.9):][ix]))
plt.show()
imshow(np.squeeze(preds_val_t[ix]))
plt.show()
In this comprehensive blog post, we have covered the UNET architecture for image segmentation. By addressing the constraints of prior methodologies, UNET architecture has revolutionized picture segmentation. Its encoding and decoding routes, skip connections, and other modifications, such as U-Net++, Attention U-Net, and Dense U-Net, have proven highly effective in capturing context, maintaining spatial information, and boosting segmentation accuracy. The potential for accurate and automatic segmentation with UNET offers new pathways to improve computer vision and beyond. We encourage readers to learn more about UNET and experiment with its implementation to maximize its utility in their picture segmentation projects.
Hope you like the article about the U-Net structure, a widely-used neural network designed for image segmentation. U-Net features an innovative design that includes both an encoder and a decoder, complemented by skip connections. This architecture enables the network to make precise predictions for every pixel in an image. Understanding the U-Net structure highlights its effectiveness and adaptability in various applications, such as medical imaging and satellite data analysis, where accuracy at the pixel level is crucial.
1. Image segmentation is essential in computer vision tasks, allowing the division of images into meaningful regions or objects.
2. Traditional approaches to image segmentation, such as manual annotation and pixel-wise classification, have limitations in terms of efficiency and accuracy.
3. Develop the UNET architecture to address these limitations and achieve accurate segmentation results.
4. It is a fully convolutional neural network (FCN) combining an encoding path to capture high-level features and a decoding method to generate the segmentation mask.
5. Skip connections in UNET preserve spatial information, enhance feature propagation, and improve segmentation accuracy.
6. Found successful applications in medical imaging, satellite imagery analysis, and industrial quality control, achieving notable benchmarks and recognition in competitions.
A. The U-Net architecture is a popular convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture common for image segmentation tasks. Initially developed for biomedical image segmentation, it has since found applications in various domains. The U-Net architecture handles local and global information and has a U-shaped encoder-decoder structure.
A. The U-Net architecture consists of an encoder path and a decoder path. The encoder path gradually reduces the spatial dimensions of the input image while increasing the number of feature channels. This helps in extracting abstract and high-level features. The decoder path performs upsampling and concatenation operations. And recover the spatial dimensions while reducing the number of feature channels. The network learns to combine the low-level features from the encoder path with the high-level features from the decoder path to generate segmentation masks.
A. The U-Net architecture offers several advantages for image segmentation tasks. Firstly, its U-shaped design allows for combining low-level and high-level features, enabling better localization of objects. Secondly, the skip connections between the encoder and decoder paths help preserve spatial information, allowing for more precise segmentation. Lastly, the U-Net architecture has a relatively small number of parameters, making it more computationally efficient than other architectures.
U-Net is better than CNN for image segmentation tasks because it has a U-shaped architecture that allows it to capture both high-level and low-level features of an image, as well as skip connections that preserve spatial information. This makes it better at segmenting fine-grained details, even with limited data.