I was starring at the computer screen for the final clustering result. Finally, I opened the output file and found the first cluster with more than 90% of the data-points. 6 other clusters composed the 10% of the remaining data-points. I packed up my bag and thought over the possible reasons of this dramatic failure of the technique on the way home.
This article will illustrate how to tackle such problems in a systematic manner by exploring the possible reasons of such failure. As this is the second part of the concept (please read basics of clustering here), we assume the reader is comfortable with the two clustering techniques widely used in the industry and their mechanisms.
[stextbox id=”section”]Definition of a good cluster analysis :[/stextbox]
There are two basic requirements of a good cluster analysis :
1. Data-points within same cluster share similar profile : Statistical method to judge this criterion is simply checking the standard deviation for each input variable in each cluster. A perfect separation in case of cluster analysis is rarely achieved. Hence,even one standard deviation distance between two cluster means is considered to be a good separation.
2. Well spread proportion of data-points among clusters : There are no industry standards for this requirement. But a minimum of 5% and maximum of 35% of the total population can be assumed as a safe range for each cluster.
[stextbox id=”section”]A hard nut to crack:[/stextbox]
This illustrative example is very similar to the problem I faced recently while doing a cluster analysis. Following is what I did to build clusters :
1. Identifying all possible variables which can be used for clustering technique
2. Outlier treatment and missing value fixation
3. Identifying most significant variables to be considered for final clustering analysis using VARCLUS, one of the technique to find independent variables
4. Finding final clusters using FASTCLUS, fastest technique to do a k-means clustering
Following is a graphical representation of the clusters I get:
Cluster 1 : 90%
Cluster 2 : 5%
Cluster 3 : 5%
This does not qualify as a good cluster analysis.
[stextbox id=”section”]What could have gone wrong?[/stextbox]
Whenever stuck with bad results for any modelling technique, the best way to solve it is not trying different solution but to explore what could have gone wrong. Let’s try to do the same in this case. Following are some of the hypothesis around what could have gone wrong :
1. Outliers still present : Try making outlier definition stricter. This has been a savior for me in most of the cases. Try capping and flouring instead of removing the outlier.
2. Presence of overshadowing variable : This kind of variable generally become visible in the FASTCLUS output, in the significance table. If the significance index of a particular variable is exceptionally high, try replacing it with the next best variable. This next best variable can be found at the VARCLUS step.
What if the problem still remains? What does this indicate?
It indicates that the population is too homogeneous to be segmented. This problem is the hardest nut to crack. Try incorporating more data points to start with. If the problem still remains we need to do clustering at a finer level. We will now discuss this method in detail.
Possible Clustering Technique and their advantages
1. Hierarchical Clustering : The advantage of this technique is that it becomes very handy to club different data-points. In other words, the output of the model is a tree and we can choose any combination from the tree to build clusters for different number of clusters. The disadvantage of technique is that it can handle only few data-points and takes exponential time for the high number of observations. If this were not a constraint for the technique, no cluster analysis would have failed.
2. k-means Clustering : The advantage of this technique is that it can handle huge number of observations and takes very less time compared to all other available techniques. The disadvantage of the technique is that changing the process in between to club data-points to the second best cluster is not possible. Hence, the method is much more rigid when compared to Hierarchical Clustering.
The two techniques have opposite pros and cons and hence can be used together to compliment each other.
[stextbox id=”section”]What if we combine the two methods?[/stextbox]
Following is the technique I finally used to get reasonable and actionable clusters :
1. Use outlier removal and overshadowing variable removal technique
2. Use k-means method to get many granular cluster : Build number of granular clusters. For n number of final cluster required, I put k=3 to 4 times n. Following is an illustrative figure to demonstrate this step :
We get 10 smaller clusters with size ranging from 2-25% of the same population.
3. Use Hierarchical Clustering to club these granular clusters : Plug the mean values of the granular clusters as individual data-points to hierarchical clustering. This will give a line diagram as output. Choose the combinations which will not lead a cluster to go above 35% and make sure all the clusters come above 5%. Following is an illustrative figure of this step :
The output of this step is a set of clusters complying to both the constraints of a good clustering analysis.
[stextbox id=”section”]End Notes :[/stextbox]
As the method demonstrated above uses finer differences between observation, which were not differentiated by simply using k-means, the technique needs to be verified for the separation test. In such cases, when strong separation is not possible between observations, vastly different actionable should not be taken for each cluster.
What do think of this technique? Do you think this provides a solution to any problem you face? Are there any other techniques you use to improve separation of your clustering models ? Do let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Tavish Srivastava, co-founder and Chief Strategy Officer of Analytics Vidhya, is an IIT Madras graduate and a passionate data-science professional with 8+ years of diverse experience in markets including the US, India and Singapore, domains including Digital Acquisitions, Customer Servicing and Customer Management, and industry including Retail Banking, Credit Cards and Insurance. He is fascinated by the idea of artificial intelligence inspired by human intelligence and enjoys every discussion, theory or even movie related to this idea.
Clustering | Different Methods, and Application...
Getting your clustering right (Part I)
20+ Questions to Test your Skills on K-Means Cl...
40 Questions & Answers on Clustering Techni...
A Quick Tutorial on Clustering for Data Science...
20 Questions to Test Your Skills on Hierarchica...
A Detailed Introduction to K-means Clustering i...
An Introduction to K-Means Clustering
A Simple Guide to Centroid Based Clustering (wi...
Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm Python!
We use cookies essential for this site to function well. Please click to help us improve its usefulness with additional cookies. Learn about our use of cookies in our Privacy Policy & Cookies Policy.
Show details
This site uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience possible. To learn more about how we use cookies, please refer to our Privacy Policy & Cookies Policy.
It is needed for personalizing the website.
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
This cookie is used to prevent Cross-site request forgery (often abbreviated as CSRF) attacks of the website
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTPS
Preserves the login/logout state of users across the whole site.
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTPS
Preserves users' states across page requests.
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTPS
Google One-Tap login adds this g_state cookie to set the user status on how they interact with the One-Tap modal.
Expiry: 365 days
Type: HTTP
Used by Microsoft Clarity, to store and track visits across websites.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Used by Microsoft Clarity, Persists the Clarity User ID and preferences, unique to that site, on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Used by Microsoft Clarity, Connects multiple page views by a user into a single Clarity session recording.
Expiry: 1 Day
Type: HTTP
Collects user data is specifically adapted to the user or device. The user can also be followed outside of the loaded website, creating a picture of the visitor's behavior.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Use to measure the use of the website for internal analytics
Expiry: 1 Years
Type: HTTP
The cookie is set by embedded Microsoft Clarity scripts. The purpose of this cookie is for heatmap and session recording.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Collected user data is specifically adapted to the user or device. The user can also be followed outside of the loaded website, creating a picture of the visitor's behavior.
Expiry: 2 Months
Type: HTTP
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected includes the number of visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visited in an anonymous form.
Expiry: 399 Days
Type: HTTP
Used by Google Analytics, to store and count pageviews.
Expiry: 399 Days
Type: HTTP
Used by Google Analytics to collect data on the number of times a user has visited the website as well as dates for the first and most recent visit.
Expiry: 1 Day
Type: HTTP
Used to send data to Google Analytics about the visitor's device and behavior. Tracks the visitor across devices and marketing channels.
Expiry: Session
Type: PIXEL
cookies ensure that requests within a browsing session are made by the user, and not by other sites.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
use the cookie when customers want to make a referral from their gmail contacts; it helps auth the gmail account.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
This cookie is set by DoubleClick (which is owned by Google) to determine if the website visitor's browser supports cookies.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
this is used to send push notification using webengage.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
used by webenage to track auth of webenagage.
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Linkedin sets this cookie to registers statistical data on users' behavior on the website for internal analytics.
Expiry: 1 Day
Type: HTTP
Use to maintain an anonymous user session by the server.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Used as part of the LinkedIn Remember Me feature and is set when a user clicks Remember Me on the device to make it easier for him or her to sign in to that device.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Used to store information about the time a sync with the lms_analytics cookie took place for users in the Designated Countries.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Used to store information about the time a sync with the AnalyticsSyncHistory cookie took place for users in the Designated Countries.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Cookie used for Sign-in with Linkedin and/or to allow for the Linkedin follow feature.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
allow for the Linkedin follow feature.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
often used to identify you, including your name, interests, and previous activity.
Expiry: 2 Months
Type: HTTP
Tracks the time that the previous page took to load
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Used to remember a user's language setting to ensure LinkedIn.com displays in the language selected by the user in their settings
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Tracks percent of page viewed
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Indicates the start of a session for Adobe Experience Cloud
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Provides page name value (URL) for use by Adobe Analytics
Expiry: Session
Type: HTTP
Used to retain and fetch time since last visit in Adobe Analytics
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Remembers a user's display preference/theme setting
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Remembers which users have updated their display / theme preferences
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Used by Google Adsense, to store and track conversions.
Expiry: 3 Months
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
Expiry: 2 Years
Type: HTTP
These cookies are used for the purpose of targeted advertising.
Expiry: 6 Hours
Type: HTTP
These cookies are used for the purpose of targeted advertising.
Expiry: 1 Month
Type: HTTP
These cookies are used to gather website statistics, and track conversion rates.
Expiry: 1 Month
Type: HTTP
Aggregate analysis of website visitors
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
This cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisements when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
Expiry: 4 Months
Type: HTTP
Contains a unique browser and user ID, used for targeted advertising.
Expiry: 2 Months
Type: HTTP
Used by LinkedIn to track the use of embedded services.
Expiry: 1 Year
Type: HTTP
Used by LinkedIn for tracking the use of embedded services.
Expiry: 1 Day
Type: HTTP
Used by LinkedIn to track the use of embedded services.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Use these cookies to assign a unique ID when users visit a website.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
These cookies are set by LinkedIn for advertising purposes, including: tracking visitors so that more relevant ads can be presented, allowing users to use the 'Apply with LinkedIn' or the 'Sign-in with LinkedIn' functions, collecting information about how visitors use the site, etc.
Expiry: 6 Months
Type: HTTP
Used to make a probabilistic match of a user's identity outside the Designated Countries
Expiry: 90 Days
Type: HTTP
Used to collect information for analytics purposes.
Expiry: 1 year
Type: HTTP
Used to store session ID for a users session to ensure that clicks from adverts on the Bing search engine are verified for reporting purposes and for personalisation
Expiry: 1 Day
Type: HTTP
Cookie declaration last updated on 24/03/2023 by Analytics Vidhya.
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third-party services that appear on our pages. Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us, and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.
Edit
Resend OTP
Resend OTP in 45s
Hi Tavish, Can you throw some light on the output results that come out of running PROC VARCLUS and FASTCLUS and explain the interpretations and industry standards? For example things like "cubic clustering criterion". If you can take the output and provide some examples that would be great!
Hi Tavish Can you please answer few questions for me : 1. I have a dataset of ~5 lakhs records and a system of high computation. I am able to perform both k means and heirarchical in R successfully. Which method should I prefer? 2. I have a dataset of 5 lakh rows and 50 variables. There are categorical variables with multiple categories (~Eg. State) and there are nominal categories (~Eg. loan issuance year). How do I handle such categorical and nominal categories? I am using R and am not aware of the any procedure which might replicate VARCLUS procedure in R. Any suggestions?
i want to use this article in definition of my thesis. could you plz send me the references of this article?