In NoSQL databases, Cassandra and MongoDB stand out as versatile solutions for handling vast volumes of unstructured data. Businesses seeking real-time data management and agility are turning to these alternatives, leaving traditional RDBMS systems behind. This article delves into the strengths of Cassandra vs MongoDB, assisting users in making informed choices based on their specific application needs, workload patterns, and desired consistency levels.
Facebook initially developed Cassandra, which is now maintained by the Apache Software Foundation. It remains popular for large data applications due to its high availability, scalability, and fault-tolerant distributed design with no single point of failure. Cassandra supports data replication across multiple servers, making it ideal for write-intensive applications.
What is MongoDB?
MongoDB, created by MongoDB Inc., is a document-oriented database system known for its scalability and flexibility. Handling unstructured data is effortless as it stores data in JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas. MongoDB simplifies data storage and retrieval without complex joins or schema changes. It optimizes read-intensive applications with automatic sharding for horizontal scaling.
Cassandra vs. MongoDB: Overview
Feature
Cassandra
MongoDB
Database Type
Wide-column store
Document-oriented store
Data Model
Schema-agnostic
JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas
Scalability
Highly scalable, designed for horizontal scaling
Horizontally scalable with automatic sharding
Consistency Model
Tunable consistency levels (from strong to eventual)
Strong consistency within a single replica set
Read Performance
Optimized for write-intensive applications
Optimized for read-intensive applications
Write Performance
High write throughput with efficient write operations
Supports efficient writes, but not as high as Cassandra
Data Replication
Multi-master replication across multiple data centers
Replica sets with automatic failover
Fault Tolerance
Highly fault-tolerant with no single point of failure
Supports automatic failover with replica sets
Query Language
CQL (Cassandra Query Language)
MongoDB Query Language (MQL)
Indexing
Secondary indexes supported
Secondary indexes and compound indexes supported
Joins
No support for traditional joins
No support for traditional joins
Schema Evolution
Schema changes require data migration and planning
Flexible schema with no need for data migration
Use Cases
Time-series data, sensor data, IoT applications
Content management systems, real-time analytics
Community Support
Strong open-source community support
Well-established community and commercial support
Cassandra vs. MongoDB: The NoSQL Databases
Data model: MongoDB uses a document data model where data is stored in documents, similar to JSON whereas Cassandra uses a column-family data model where data is stored in rows with columns grouped into column families.
Scalability: Both databases can manage massive data sets by adding more nodes to the group because they are highly scalable. However, Cassandra needs human partitioning and tuning, while MongoDB uses automatic scalability, making scale easier.
Consistency: Cassandra can accept some data errors in exchange for improved availability because it emphasizes texture. Reads always give the most recent write in MongoDB, which provides strong consistency by default.
Performance: MongoDB is optimized for read-heavy tasks, and Cassandra is optimized for mostly write-intensive tasks. The storage engine that Cassandra employs, the log-structured merge tree (LSM-tree), is efficient for writes but can be slow for reads. MongoDB uses a read- and write-optimized document-oriented storage engine.
Applications: Cassandra is often used for high-volume, high-speed applications that need scalability and quick writes, such as social networking sites and IoT devices. Applications with flexible data models and fast reads, such as content management systems and e-commerce websites, frequently use MongoDB.
Cassandra vs MongoDB: Data Model and Query Language
One of the most crucial parts of any database system is the query language, followed by the data model. These are some critical distinctions between Cassandra and MongoDB’s data schema and query language:
Data Model: Cassandra uses a column-family data model, where data is saved in rows with columns organized into column families, whereas MongoDB uses a document-based data model, where data is stored in documents. Every document in MongoDB is allowed to have a unique structure; a predefined schema is not required. On the other hand, the columns and column families that will be used to store the data must be defined in advance for Cassandra.
MongoDB has a flexible and potent query language called the MongoDB Query Language (MQL). Filtering, aggregating, and sorting are elements of MQL that facilitate extensive document queries. The Aggregation Framework, a secondary query language supported by MongoDB, enables more complex data processing and analysis.
Indexing:MongoDB offers a variety of indexing options, including single-field, multi-field, and geospatial indexes, to maximize query performance. While Cassandra does not support multi-field indexes and geospatial indexing, it does provide secondary indexes on column values.
MongoDB offers ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) compliance at the document level, ensuring the consistency and longevity of each document. On the other hand, Cassandra offers eventual consistency, which means that modifications could take some time to spread among the cluster’s nodes.
Comparison of Data Replication and Consistency Models
Each database system’s performance and consistency are directly affected by its data replication and consistency models, which are essential components. This is a comparison of Cassandra and MongoDB’s data replication and consistency models:
Data Replication: For high reliability and fault tolerance, Cassandra and MongoDB both provide data replication. With Cassandra’s masterless architecture, data is replicated across numerous nodes in a ring topology. The number of copies of the data stored throughout the cluster depends on the replication factor, and each node is in charge of a specific data set. The master-slave architecture used by MongoDB designates one node as the primary node to which all writes are directed. One or more secondary nodes can be used for reading activities after the primary node replicates data.
Consistency Models: Cassandra and MongoDB employ many consistency model strategies. Tunable consistency is a feature of Cassandra that allows users to select the degree of consistency needed for each read or write operation. Consistency is broken down into four groups: quorum, all, one, and any. Most nodes must agree on the data in a quorum, the most common consistency level before a response can be given. Strong consistency is a feature that MongoDB, by default, offers, making writes immediately visible to all reads. Moreover, MongoDB supports eventual consistency, which is helpful for applications where high availability is more crucial than data freshness.
Resolution of Conflicts: Conflicts may occur when multiple nodes simultaneously change the same piece of data in distributed systems. The most recent update is given precedence in Cassandra’s last-write-wins conflict resolution system. MongoDB has various ways to solve errors, including using timestamps or version numbers to identify the most recent update.
Performance and Scalability Comparison
Performance:
Cassandra has quick write times and efficient data storage, making it perfect for tasks that include much writing. It uses a distributed architecture with a peer-to-peer architecture that allows fault tolerance and horizontal scaling.
MongoDB offers fast query rates and flexible machine learning, making it ideal for workloads involving much reading. It enables managing unstructured or primarily structured data easier by using a document-oriented data architecture that stores data in documents that resemble JSON.
Scalability:
Cassandra is designed to scale horizontally, allowing the addition of extra nodes to a cluster and the equitable distribution of data among them. This makes it a strong option for large-scale, fast-moving data tasks requiring high availability and fast writes.
Moreover, MongoDB offers sharding, which divides data among different servers and enables horizontal scaling. It could need more proper management and configuration to provide the best performance and scalability.
Choosing Between Cassandra vs MongoDB
The choice between Cassandra and MongoDB will be based on a number of factors, including the specific needs of your business application, the architecture of your data, your query patterns, and your need for scalability.
Best Practices:
Consider scalability when creating your data model, keeping in mind both the expansion of your data and the demands of your query patterns.
To improve query performance, use the appropriate indexing and partitioning techniques.
To ensure peak performance, regularly check the performance of your database and make any improvements.
Use the appropriate replication and backup techniques to ensure high availability and data durability.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Cassandra and MongoDB are popular NoSQL databases designed to handle a large amount of unstructured Data. And the choice between Cassandra and MongoDB depends on the application’s specific needs, including the type of data being stored, the query patterns, and the desired consistency level. For high-volume, high-velocity applications that need quick writes and scalability, Cassandra is frequently a preferable option, even though MongoDB may be more versatile in terms of the data type and query language.
Key takeaways
We have seen the definition and overview of Cassandra and MongoDB.
And the Key differences in Data Model and Query Language are also a comparison of Data Replication and Consistency Models.
Performance and Scalability Comparison of two and factors to Consider between two and Best Practices.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Is MongoDB better than Cassandra?
A. The choice between MongoDB and Cassandra depends on the specific use case and requirements. MongoDB is better suited for flexible data models and complex queries, while Cassandra excels in high availability and scalability for distributed systems.
Q2. Why is Cassandra faster than MongoDB?
A. Cassandra’s superior speed is attributed to its distributed architecture, which allows data to be distributed across multiple nodes, reducing read and write latencies. It also employs a decentralized approach, ensuring high performance in massive-scale deployments.
Q3. Is Cassandra the same as MongoDB?
A. No, Cassandra and MongoDB are two different NoSQL databases with distinct features and use cases. Cassandra is designed for scalability and fault tolerance in distributed systems, while MongoDB focuses on flexibility and ease of development.
Q4. Can MongoDB replace Cassandra?
A. It depends on the specific requirements of the application. While MongoDB can serve as a replacement for Cassandra in certain scenarios, such as when the focus is on flexibility and simplicity, the decision should be based on the specific needs and demands of the project.
The media shown in this article is not owned by Analytics Vidhya and is used at the Author’s discretion.
My self Bhutanadhu Hari, 2023 Graduated from Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur ( IITJ ) . I am interested in Web Development and Machine Learning and most passionate about exploring Artificial Intelligence.
We use cookies essential for this site to function well. Please click to help us improve its usefulness with additional cookies. Learn about our use of cookies in our Privacy Policy & Cookies Policy.
Show details
Powered By
Cookies
This site uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience possible. To learn more about how we use cookies, please refer to our Privacy Policy & Cookies Policy.
brahmaid
It is needed for personalizing the website.
csrftoken
This cookie is used to prevent Cross-site request forgery (often abbreviated as CSRF) attacks of the website
Identityid
Preserves the login/logout state of users across the whole site.
sessionid
Preserves users' states across page requests.
g_state
Google One-Tap login adds this g_state cookie to set the user status on how they interact with the One-Tap modal.
MUID
Used by Microsoft Clarity, to store and track visits across websites.
_clck
Used by Microsoft Clarity, Persists the Clarity User ID and preferences, unique to that site, on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
_clsk
Used by Microsoft Clarity, Connects multiple page views by a user into a single Clarity session recording.
SRM_I
Collects user data is specifically adapted to the user or device. The user can also be followed outside of the loaded website, creating a picture of the visitor's behavior.
SM
Use to measure the use of the website for internal analytics
CLID
The cookie is set by embedded Microsoft Clarity scripts. The purpose of this cookie is for heatmap and session recording.
SRM_B
Collected user data is specifically adapted to the user or device. The user can also be followed outside of the loaded website, creating a picture of the visitor's behavior.
_gid
This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected includes the number of visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visited in an anonymous form.
_ga_#
Used by Google Analytics, to store and count pageviews.
_gat_#
Used by Google Analytics to collect data on the number of times a user has visited the website as well as dates for the first and most recent visit.
collect
Used to send data to Google Analytics about the visitor's device and behavior. Tracks the visitor across devices and marketing channels.
AEC
cookies ensure that requests within a browsing session are made by the user, and not by other sites.
G_ENABLED_IDPS
use the cookie when customers want to make a referral from their gmail contacts; it helps auth the gmail account.
test_cookie
This cookie is set by DoubleClick (which is owned by Google) to determine if the website visitor's browser supports cookies.
_we_us
this is used to send push notification using webengage.
WebKlipperAuth
used by webenage to track auth of webenagage.
ln_or
Linkedin sets this cookie to registers statistical data on users' behavior on the website for internal analytics.
JSESSIONID
Use to maintain an anonymous user session by the server.
li_rm
Used as part of the LinkedIn Remember Me feature and is set when a user clicks Remember Me on the device to make it easier for him or her to sign in to that device.
AnalyticsSyncHistory
Used to store information about the time a sync with the lms_analytics cookie took place for users in the Designated Countries.
lms_analytics
Used to store information about the time a sync with the AnalyticsSyncHistory cookie took place for users in the Designated Countries.
liap
Cookie used for Sign-in with Linkedin and/or to allow for the Linkedin follow feature.
visit
allow for the Linkedin follow feature.
li_at
often used to identify you, including your name, interests, and previous activity.
s_plt
Tracks the time that the previous page took to load
lang
Used to remember a user's language setting to ensure LinkedIn.com displays in the language selected by the user in their settings
s_tp
Tracks percent of page viewed
AMCV_14215E3D5995C57C0A495C55%40AdobeOrg
Indicates the start of a session for Adobe Experience Cloud
s_pltp
Provides page name value (URL) for use by Adobe Analytics
s_tslv
Used to retain and fetch time since last visit in Adobe Analytics
li_theme
Remembers a user's display preference/theme setting
li_theme_set
Remembers which users have updated their display / theme preferences
We do not use cookies of this type.
_gcl_au
Used by Google Adsense, to store and track conversions.
SID
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
SAPISID
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
__Secure-#
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
APISID
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
SSID
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
HSID
Save certain preferences, for example the number of search results per page or activation of the SafeSearch Filter. Adjusts the ads that appear in Google Search.
DV
These cookies are used for the purpose of targeted advertising.
NID
These cookies are used for the purpose of targeted advertising.
1P_JAR
These cookies are used to gather website statistics, and track conversion rates.
OTZ
Aggregate analysis of website visitors
_fbp
This cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisements when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr
Contains a unique browser and user ID, used for targeted advertising.
bscookie
Used by LinkedIn to track the use of embedded services.
lidc
Used by LinkedIn for tracking the use of embedded services.
bcookie
Used by LinkedIn to track the use of embedded services.
aam_uuid
Use these cookies to assign a unique ID when users visit a website.
UserMatchHistory
These cookies are set by LinkedIn for advertising purposes, including: tracking visitors so that more relevant ads can be presented, allowing users to use the 'Apply with LinkedIn' or the 'Sign-in with LinkedIn' functions, collecting information about how visitors use the site, etc.
li_sugr
Used to make a probabilistic match of a user's identity outside the Designated Countries
MR
Used to collect information for analytics purposes.
ANONCHK
Used to store session ID for a users session to ensure that clicks from adverts on the Bing search engine are verified for reporting purposes and for personalisation
We do not use cookies of this type.
Cookie declaration last updated on 24/03/2023 by Analytics Vidhya.
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies, we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third-party services that appear on our pages. Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us, and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.