AI Art vs Human Art: Is the Ghibli Trend a Tribute or a Theft?

So here’s how I stumbled deeper into this debate…

It all started with an Instagram reel. Someone had posted a short video calling out the now-viral trend of turning photos into AI-generated Studio Ghibli-style art. The message? That this was stealing, a disrespectful shortcut that undermines the work of real artists. According to them, people using these AI tools were mindlessly generating “Ghibli-fied” images without thinking about the ethics behind it.

I didn’t fully agree. So I did what any thoughtful (and slightly impulsive) social media user does – I dropped a comment. I wrote that while I understood the concern, I saw this trend as something kind of beautiful. After all, it’s bringing Studio Ghibli’s dreamy aesthetic to people who may have never seen a Ghibli film before. Isn’t that a win for the art itself?

And at first, it seemed like others agreed. Likes started piling up. I thought, “Cool, people get where I’m coming from.”

But then… it happened. My notifications exploded.

Critics jumped in, calling it lazy, unethical, and worse. My simple comment sparked a mini-war in my DMs and replies. It honestly caught me off guard – but it also got me thinking: What is really going on here?

So, I decided to dig deeper. What are the facts? What’s the harm, if any? Is this trend uplifting or undermining the legacy of Ghibli and traditional animation? And where does it fall in the larger conversation of AI art vs human art?

And that, my friends, is how we ended up right here, exploring the complicated, emotional, and sometimes chaotic intersection of AI and art.

What’s the Studio Ghibli AI Trend Anyway?

Studio Ghibli, founded in 1985 by animation legends Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata, is globally revered for its detailed, hand-drawn animation. Films like Spirited Away, Princess Mononoke, and My Neighbor Totoro aren’t just movies, they’re emotional, cultural experiences built frame by painstaking frame.

The recent trend took off when GPT-4o and similar tools like Midjourney and Grok began generating images in recognizable art styles- yes, including Ghibli’s. Type in a prompt like “a corgi running through a magical forest in Ghibli style,” and in seconds you’ve got an image that looks like it came from Miyazaki’s sketchbook (but didn’t).

Celebrities have jumped on it. Elon Musk posted a Ghibli-esque version of himself clutching Dogecoin (because of course he did).

Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, updated his profile picture with his Ghiblified Image. 

Hashtags like #Ghiblified and #AIart are racking up millions of views. And I’ll be honest, some of these AI creations are gorgeous. They’re introducing new audiences to Ghibli’s aesthetic. People who’ve never watched Howl’s Moving Castle are suddenly enchanted by its vibe. That’s kind of magical.

But it’s also kind of controversial.

Also Read: 10 Image Generation Prompts to Try Out on GPT-4o

What AI Art Makes Possible?

Let’s start with the good news. One major upside of the Ghibli AI trend is accessibility. Not everyone can draw like Miyazaki. Heck, most of us can’t even draw stick figures. But now, anyone can prompt a scene and see it brought to life in a style they admire. That’s democratizing creativity.

And people aren’t just creating for the sake of going viral. There’s genuine emotional investment here. Some users are turning childhood photos into Ghibli-style portraits. Others are imagining beloved pets in magical landscapes. This isn’t just digital play – it’s personal storytelling.

Also worth noting: Ghibli films often emphasize environmentalism, kindness, and introspection. If AI art can spread those values – even secondhand – isn’t that a cultural win?

Plus, let’s not forget that even traditional animators today use digital tools. Adobe Animate, Toon Boom, TVPaint, AI could be just the next evolution. As artist and YouTuber Ethan Becker pointed out, “Using a tool doesn’t make you less of an artist. It’s what you do with it that counts.”

But Wait.. What About Ethics?

Okay, here’s where things get thorny.

First up: Hayao Miyazaki himself is not a fan of AI-generated art. In a now-famous 2016 interview, he slammed an AI-generated animation demo, saying it was “an insult to life itself.” Here’s the link to the full documentary if you’re interested – Never-Ending Man: Hayao Miyazaki.

For Miyazaki, animation is about intentionality. Every movement, every background detail, reflects human emotion and purpose. That’s not something an algorithm can mimic.

If you want to learn more about the creative process of the legendary Japanese filmmaker you can watch this 4-part documentary – 10 Years with Hayao Miyazaki.

Then there’s the copyright question. While Studio Ghibli’s specific character designs are protected, general “art styles” exist in a legal gray area. AI companies say their models don’t directly copy any living artist. But critics argue that training data scraped from the web, including fan art, concept designs, and animation stills—implicitly borrows from copyrighted works. That could open the door to future legal battles.

In fact, multiple lawsuits are already underway. Getty Images is suing Stability AI over copyright infringement. The U.S. Copyright Office has also stated that AI-generated works are not eligible for copyright protection unless there’s significant human authorship involved.

And then there are the deeper cultural concerns:

• Does this trend trivialize the countless hours Ghibli animators spent crafting each frame?
• Is AI celebrating or commodifying Japanese art?
• Who benefits when a billion-dollar company automates the essence of someone else’s legacy?

These aren’t easy questions, but they’re worth asking – especially in the context of AI Art vs human art, where the definitions of creativity and ownership are still evolving.

Is This Innovation or Imitation?

Let’s zoom out.

The real tension here isn’t just about Ghibli. It’s about what art is, and whether AI can be part of it. Critics argue that AI lacks soul because it doesn’t feel. It doesn’t dream. It doesn’t struggle through creative blocks or draw inspiration from heartbreak, nature, or nostalgia.

But defenders of AI art say that’s a narrow view. Art has always been shaped by tools—charcoal, oil paint, photography, Photoshop. Is AI just another brush?

And what about collaboration? Some artists are already blending AI into their workflow—using it for background concepts, lighting studies, or mood boards. As long as they maintain authorship, isn’t that valid?

Maybe the real issue isn’t AI itself, but how we use it. There’s a huge difference between:

• A fan using AI to imagine their cat as a Ghibli character
• A brand mass-producing “Ghibli-style” ads without permission or compensation

The first is passion. The second is exploitation.

My Take on AI Art vs Human Art

So where do I land?

Honestly, I think this trend is kind of awesome but only when done with respect and transparency. Seeing Ghibli’s aesthetic reach new people is exciting. Watching someone light up because they saw their childhood memory or last memory with their parents or loved ones reimagined in Ghibli style? That’s priceless.

But yeah, the concerns are valid. We owe it to artists, especially those like Miyazaki, who’ve given us such emotional, intricate worlds—to treat their work with care. And here’s a thought: if AI-generated art is here to stay (and let’s be real it is), maybe the solution isn’t to shut it down, but to structure it better.

What if there were a compensation system built into these platforms? Something that:

• Credits original studios or artists when their aesthetic is used
• Allows opt-in or opt-out licensing for style training data
• Even shares revenue from viral outputs or commercial uses

AI doesn’t have to be the villain here. At its best, it can amplify creativity, not erase it. But it needs to be part of a system that values the humans who laid the groundwork in the first place. Let’s make sure artists are part of the conversation – not just data points being scraped in silence.

So yeah, I’m here for the magic but only if it’s built on fairness.

Now It’s Your Turn

As the excitement and debate continue, it’s your turn to weigh in:

• Is the Ghibli AI trend a harmless tribute that celebrates and introduces the beauty of Miyazaki’s art?
• Or is it crossing an ethical and artistic line, disrespecting the deep creativity behind original animations?

Do comment down below, we would love to know your views.

Himanshi Singh

I’m a data lover who enjoys finding hidden patterns and turning them into useful insights. As the Manager - Content and Growth at Analytics Vidhya, I help data enthusiasts learn, share, and grow together. 

Thanks for stopping by my profile - hope you found something you liked :)